Triple

T32742139
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Resurrection E837243 entity
Predicate associatedWithChoralSymphonyTradition P205147 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Resurrection, associatedWithChoralSymphonyTradition, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedWithChoralSymphonyTradition
Context triple: [Resurrection, associatedWithChoralSymphonyTradition, yes]
  • A. usesChorale
    Indicates that one entity incorporates or employs a chorale (a hymn-like musical piece) within its structure or content.
  • B. hasChoralArrangementsBy
    Indicates that one entity (typically a musical work) has choral arrangements created or adapted by the specified entity.
  • C. hasChoralQuality
    Indicates that something possesses characteristics typical of choral music, such as multiple voices or parts combining in a coordinated, ensemble-like manner.
  • D. hasChoralArrangement
    Indicates that one entity is a choral arrangement version or setting of another entity (typically an original musical work).
  • E. associatedWithHymns
    Indicates that something has a connection or relationship to hymns, such as being used in, derived from, or thematically linked to them.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f34936e1748190b797e406e4e9293a completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037cad051c8190b28b354b89208574 completed May 12, 2026, 7:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0379f0cbe481909b4b8fc6cbe297f0 completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a037cab06288190b093935f235ddff2 completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:12 a.m.