Triple
T32696978
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Juror 2 |
E836035
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipToJuror8 |
P205137
|
FINISHED |
| Object | persuaded by Juror 8’s reasonable doubt arguments |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: persuaded by Juror 8’s reasonable doubt arguments | Statement: [Juror 2, relationshipToJuror8, persuaded by Juror 8’s reasonable doubt arguments]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToJuror8 Context triple: [Juror 2, relationshipToJuror8, persuaded by Juror 8’s reasonable doubt arguments]
-
A.
hasJuror
Indicates that a person or legal body is assigned or associated with a specific juror in a judicial context.
-
B.
jurorDescription
Indicates that a person is described as serving or having served in the role of a juror, often including details about their status or characteristics in that capacity.
-
C.
relationshipToJudges4
Indicates a specified type of relationship or connection that an entity has to a particular group or set of judges.
-
D.
jurorNumber
Indicates the specific numerical identifier assigned to a juror within a jury.
-
E.
jurorProfession
Indicates that an individual serves in the professional role or capacity of a juror in a legal proceeding.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3493323288190a4e88251035fe96e |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037cad051c8190b28b354b89208574 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379f0cbe481909b4b8fc6cbe297f0 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a037cab06288190b093935f235ddff2 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:10 a.m.