Triple
T32615989
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Oz (pseudonym) |
E833784
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasConfidentialIdentity |
P129061
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Oz (pseudonym), hasConfidentialIdentity, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasConfidentialIdentity Context triple: [Oz (pseudonym), hasConfidentialIdentity, true]
-
A.
hasHiddenIdentity
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses a secret or concealed identity that is not known to others.
-
B.
isConfidential
Indicates that the associated information, communication, or resource is intended to be kept secret and restricted to authorized parties only.
-
C.
hasNotableIdentity
Indicates that an entity is recognized for a specific, distinguished role, status, or identity that makes it notable.
-
D.
hasConfidentialityObligation
Indicates that an entity is bound by a duty to keep certain information secret and not disclose it to unauthorized parties.
-
E.
hasIdentity
Indicates that one entity is the same as, or is identified as, another specific entity or identifier.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3492bfa648190b6ae472074634e29 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037cad051c8190b28b354b89208574 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379f0cbe481909b4b8fc6cbe297f0 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:06 a.m.