Triple

T32605534
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Carriston’s Gift E833498 entity
Predicate hasRelativePopularity P106096 FINISHED
Object lesser-known LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lesser-known | Statement: [Carriston’s Gift, hasRelativePopularity, lesser-known]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRelativePopularity
Context triple: [Carriston’s Gift, hasRelativePopularity, lesser-known]
  • A. popularityRelativeTo chosen
    Indicates how the popularity of one entity compares to the popularity of another entity, typically in terms of being more, less, or equally popular.
  • B. hasPopularityCharacteristic
    Indicates that an entity possesses a particular attribute or quality related to its level or type of popularity.
  • C. hasPopularityScope
    Indicates that the popularity of an entity is evaluated or applicable within a specified scope, context, or audience.
  • D. hasPopularityInfluencedBy
    Indicates that the popularity level of one entity is affected or shaped by another specified factor or entity.
  • E. hasRelativeProminenceComparedTo
    Indicates that one entity has a greater, lesser, or otherwise specified level of prominence or importance when compared to another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3492ab63c8190aec24d5003b47c29 completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a03008316dc8190a9f6faf48d25a4f8 completed May 12, 2026, 10:27 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a030023e66881909ea79f1365ab538a completed May 12, 2026, 10:25 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:05 a.m.