Triple
T32587194
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Princess of Portugal (Nossa Senhora da Conceição) |
E832953
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedDogma |
P137172
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Immaculate Conception |
E9709
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Immaculate Conception | Statement: [Princess of Portugal (Nossa Senhora da Conceição), associatedDogma, Immaculate Conception]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedDogma Context triple: [Princess of Portugal (Nossa Senhora da Conceição), associatedDogma, Immaculate Conception]
-
A.
relatedDogma
chosen
Indicates that one doctrine, belief, or dogma is conceptually or thematically connected to another.
-
B.
connectedDogmaProclaimedOn
Indicates that a particular dogma is formally linked to and proclaimed on a specific date or occasion.
-
C.
isDefinedAsDogmaBy
Indicates that one entity formally establishes or declares another entity as dogma or authoritative doctrine.
-
D.
linkedDogmaDocument
Indicates that one entity is associated with or references a specific dogma-related document as a linked resource.
-
E.
sharesDogmaWith
Indicates that two entities hold and adhere to the same set of core beliefs, doctrines, or ideological principles.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34929ff648190aded9424aa7564ae |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037cad051c8190b28b354b89208574 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:17 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a347ba8c47481908eac2a95efef46bb |
completed | June 18, 2026, 11:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379f0cbe481909b4b8fc6cbe297f0 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:04 a.m.