Triple
T32538325
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Porphyrian tree |
E831648
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasConceptualRoot |
P48732
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Aristotle’s logical works |
E1276671
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Aristotle’s logical works | Statement: [Porphyrian tree, hasConceptualRoot, Aristotle’s logical works]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasConceptualRoot Context triple: [Porphyrian tree, hasConceptualRoot, Aristotle’s logical works]
-
A.
hasConceptualOrigin
chosen
Indicates that something conceptually originates from, is derived from, or is fundamentally based on another thing.
-
B.
hasConceptualStructure
Indicates that one entity embodies, organizes, or is characterized by a particular conceptual structure defined by another entity.
-
C.
hasConceptualStatus
Indicates that an entity holds a particular abstract, theoretical, or conceptual standing or classification within a given framework or context.
-
D.
hasConcept
Indicates that an entity includes, embodies, or is associated with a particular concept.
-
E.
hasConceptualLocation
Indicates that something is associated with or situated within a particular abstract, conceptual, or non-physical context or domain.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34924b1cc8190ad3aca0c0f012a7e |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c894b488190bcbec2eccaff4a01 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a34928dd35481909c0c787cba44c175 |
completed | June 19, 2026, 12:51 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379edf2d88190b492fca86ed23cac |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:01 a.m.