Triple

T32536460
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sun RPC E831601 entity
Predicate typicalLanguageBindings P42338 FINISHED
Object C E9269 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: C | Statement: [Sun RPC, typicalLanguageBindings, C]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalLanguageBindings
Context triple: [Sun RPC, typicalLanguageBindings, C]
  • A. typicalLanguages chosen
    Indicates the languages that are commonly or characteristically used, spoken, or associated with a given entity.
  • B. primaryLanguageBinding
    Indicates that one language or language-specific implementation is designated as the main or default binding for a given resource, interface, or functionality.
  • C. supportsLanguageBindingSystem
    Indicates that one entity provides mechanisms or infrastructure that enable another entity to create, use, or integrate language bindings for a system or platform.
  • D. languageTargets
    Indicates that a language is specifically directed at, intended for, or used to address a particular target entity (such as an audience, system, or domain).
  • E. languageProvision
    Indicates that one entity supplies, supports, or makes available a particular language (or set of languages) for use by another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f34924b1cc8190ad3aca0c0f012a7e completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c894b488190bcbec2eccaff4a01 completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a347064c28c8190b19791c61e8b034e completed June 18, 2026, 10:25 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0379edf2d88190b492fca86ed23cac completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:01 a.m.