Triple

T32183043
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject XLNX E822034 entity
Predicate associatedWithCompetitor P116426 FINISHED
Object Altera E29768 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Altera | Statement: [XLNX, associatedWithCompetitor, Altera]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedWithCompetitor
Context triple: [XLNX, associatedWithCompetitor, Altera]
  • A. associatedWithCompetition
    Indicates that there is a relationship or involvement between an entity and a specific competition or competitive event.
  • B. associatedOpponent chosen
    Indicates that one entity is recognized or designated as an opponent or adversary associated with another entity in a given context.
  • C. partnerInCompetition
    Indicates that two or more entities are collaborating as partners or teammates within the same competitive event or context.
  • D. hasRelatedCompetition
    Indicates that one competition is related to another competition in a meaningful way, such as being similar, connected, or associated within a shared context.
  • E. associatedWithCompetitionLevel
    Indicates that something has a relationship to, or is characterized by, a particular level or tier of competition.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3490755288190aee11740a34862f9 completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c894b488190bcbec2eccaff4a01 completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a2f0be2d1388190aa46704c20c1ea08 completed June 14, 2026, 8:15 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0379eaa540819095a1c5d9f3513f9b completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:34 a.m.