Triple

T32108810
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Dimasa people E820059 entity
Predicate primaryReligionTrend P2986 FINISHED
Object syncretic Hindu and indigenous practices LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: syncretic Hindu and indigenous practices | Statement: [Dimasa people, primaryReligionTrend, syncretic Hindu and indigenous practices]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: primaryReligionTrend
Context triple: [Dimasa people, primaryReligionTrend, syncretic Hindu and indigenous practices]
  • A. religiousTrend
    Indicates a pattern or direction of change over time in religious beliefs, practices, or affiliations among entities.
  • B. laterReligionDominant
    Indicates that a religion adopted or followed at a later time becomes the dominant or primary religion in the relevant context or entity.
  • C. dominantReligion chosen
    Indicates the religion that holds primary or majority status within a given group, region, or entity.
  • D. religiousDemographyChange
    Indicates a change over time in the religious composition or affiliation distribution within a population or region.
  • E. shareReligiousDemographics
    Indicates that two entities have similar or identical distributions of religious affiliations within their populations.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3490209c881908ec0241476715f15 completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c894b488190bcbec2eccaff4a01 completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0379eaa540819095a1c5d9f3513f9b completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:27 a.m.