Triple
T31984805
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Karen Roe |
E816691
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipToDanScott |
P206138
|
FINISHED |
| Object | high school girlfriend |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: high school girlfriend | Statement: [Karen Roe, relationshipToDanScott, high school girlfriend]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToDanScott Context triple: [Karen Roe, relationshipToDanScott, high school girlfriend]
-
A.
relationshipToDanGoodman
Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection an entity has to Dan Goodman.
-
B.
relationshipToDani
Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection that an entity has to Dani.
-
C.
relationshipToScottieFerguson
Indicates the nature or type of connection an entity has to Scottie Ferguson, such as familial, social, professional, or other relational ties.
-
D.
relationshipToKenny
Indicates the specific familial, social, or interpersonal connection that one entity has to Kenny.
-
E.
relationshipToMike
Indicates the specific type of personal, social, or familial relationship that an entity has with Mike.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348f6a3008190bfb59ca695fd68e2 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c9141dc819098d7fcc36e69882c |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379eaa540819095a1c5d9f3513f9b |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a037c7fb9f88190b384b1b68200aef0 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:12 a.m.