Triple
T31957073
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | World Championship gold medal |
E815934
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRecipientStatus |
P56927
|
FINISHED |
| Object | world champion |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: world champion | Statement: [World Championship gold medal, hasRecipientStatus, world champion]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRecipientStatus Context triple: [World Championship gold medal, hasRecipientStatus, world champion]
-
A.
hasRecipientQuality
chosen
Indicates that a recipient possesses or is characterized by a particular quality or attribute.
-
B.
hasRecipientRole
Indicates that a specified entity serves as the recipient or target role in a given interaction, transaction, or relationship.
-
C.
hasRecipientField
Indicates that something includes or defines a field intended to specify a recipient.
-
D.
hasRecipientWork
Indicates that a work (such as a document, message, or creative piece) is directed or assigned to a specific recipient entity.
-
E.
hasFirstRecipient
Indicates that an entity is the initial or primary recipient of something (such as a message, award, or transfer) in a sequence or set of recipients.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348f4ec708190abbb2a7c3ed58844 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a01b31b233c819091974a06f7a76d4a |
completed | May 11, 2026, 10:44 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a01b2c147008190bbf9e0fa1bbae1f3 |
completed | May 11, 2026, 10:43 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:08 a.m.