Triple

T31802945
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Professor Hinkle E811789 entity
Predicate relationshipToHocusPocus P38921 FINISHED
Object owner LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: owner | Statement: [Professor Hinkle, relationshipToHocusPocus, owner]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToHocusPocus
Context triple: [Professor Hinkle, relationshipToHocusPocus, owner]
  • A. relationshipToCharacter chosen
    Indicates the specific type of personal, social, or narrative connection that one entity has to a given character.
  • B. relationshipTypeWithPumpkin
    Indicates the specific kind of relationship or association an entity has with a pumpkin.
  • C. characterActorRelationship
    Indicates a relationship where an actor portrays or is associated with a specific character in a work.
  • D. relationshipToEthanEdwards
    Indicates the nature or type of connection, association, or bond that one entity has with Ethan Edwards.
  • E. hasFictionalRelationshipWith
    Indicates that there exists a fictional or imagined relationship between two entities, such as characters in a story or hypothetical scenarios.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348e70d188190b4637c5509f81274 completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c894b488190bcbec2eccaff4a01 completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0379e7aa0c8190bdc9ee4d54fc821b completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:42 p.m.