Triple
T31383044
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Thomas Rhett |
E800513
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableSong |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Marry Me
"Marry Me" is a popular country ballad by Thomas Rhett that tells a bittersweet story of unrequited love as the narrator watches the woman he loves marry someone else.
|
E1960755
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Marry Me | Statement: [Thomas Rhett, notableSong, Marry Me]
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Marry Me Triple: [Thomas Rhett, notableSong, Marry Me]
Generated description
"Marry Me" is a popular country ballad by Thomas Rhett that tells a bittersweet story of unrequited love as the narrator watches the woman he loves marry someone else.
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224e9d7048190b0cc20f9071bd3e4 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:34 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f69ff3949481909cc00ff83c1ff6ff |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:08 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a2b076887d88190b3144b91bc7215d2 |
completed | June 11, 2026, 7:07 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_6a2b0a023f608190a36b4d815010d0a3 |
completed | June 11, 2026, 7:18 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_6a2b0a76a7388190b77fbeefb1b6b26e |
completed | June 11, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:19 p.m.