Triple
T31299093
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sex Cymbal |
E798161
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTrack |
P3284
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Funky Attitude
"Funky Attitude" is a track by the band Sex Cymbal, likely featuring a lively, groove-driven style suggested by its title.
|
E1955469
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Funky Attitude | Statement: [Sex Cymbal, hasTrack, Funky Attitude]
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Funky Attitude Triple: [Sex Cymbal, hasTrack, Funky Attitude]
Generated description
"Funky Attitude" is a track by the band Sex Cymbal, likely featuring a lively, groove-driven style suggested by its title.
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224e0bd4c8190aab9b29a73f7aa3c |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f69e3287b88190b603adba1decc909 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a2a1e3766c08190bdf32369a31f7bcf |
completed | June 11, 2026, 2:32 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_6a2a28722f988190a16bf5e077d8b0ea |
completed | June 11, 2026, 3:16 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_6a2a293ed2548190ae341b29e305f3c8 |
completed | June 11, 2026, 3:19 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:14 p.m.