Triple

T31289668
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ślepowron coat of arms E797897 entity
Predicate relatedCoatOfArms P77925 FINISHED
Object Krasiński coat of arms variant LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Krasiński coat of arms variant | Statement: [Ślepowron coat of arms, relatedCoatOfArms, Krasiński coat of arms variant]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relatedCoatOfArms
Context triple: [Ślepowron coat of arms, relatedCoatOfArms, Krasiński coat of arms variant]
  • A. hasCoatOfArmsSharedWith
    Indicates that two entities share the same coat of arms design or heraldic emblem.
  • B. coatOfArms
    Indicates that one entity serves as the heraldic emblem or coat of arms representing another entity.
  • C. designerOfCoatOfArms
    Indicates that one entity is the creator or designer responsible for the coat of arms associated with another entity.
  • D. hasCoatOfArmsFeature
    Indicates that an entity’s coat of arms includes or displays a specific feature or element.
  • E. heraldicConnection chosen
    Indicates a relationship where entities are linked through heraldry, such as by shared coats of arms, heraldic symbols, lineage, or official armorial associations.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224dfde288190af313f3c221c857e completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c876524819098545e6037d3107d completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0379e5174c8190a0bdde7e381b7624 completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:14 p.m.