Triple
T31265194
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sagaing Hills |
E797233
|
entity |
| Predicate | primaryEthnicGroupInArea |
P65193
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Bamar |
E42683
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bamar | Statement: [Sagaing Hills, primaryEthnicGroupInArea, Bamar]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: primaryEthnicGroupInArea Context triple: [Sagaing Hills, primaryEthnicGroupInArea, Bamar]
-
A.
dominantEthnicGroups
chosen
Indicates that the specified ethnic groups hold primary demographic, cultural, or political prominence within a given region or population.
-
B.
primaryEthnicFocus
Indicates that something is chiefly oriented toward, concerned with, or designed for a particular ethnic group as its main focus.
-
C.
holderEthnicity
Indicates the ethnic background or group to which the holder of something (e.g., a document, account, or item) belongs.
-
D.
nearEthnicGroup
Indicates that one entity is located geographically close to an ethnic group.
-
E.
ethnicRulingGroup
Indicates that a particular ethnic group holds primary political power or governing authority over a state or territory.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224de2bbc819081af6c32e1d857b9 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c876524819098545e6037d3107d |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a296bfe186c8190a387e7b0a162dba2 |
completed | June 10, 2026, 1:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379e5174c8190a0bdde7e381b7624 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:12 p.m.