Triple

T30995507
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Meursault Premier Cru E789785 entity
Predicate typicalAgingMethod P106670 FINISHED
Object oak barrel aging LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: oak barrel aging | Statement: [Meursault Premier Cru, typicalAgingMethod, oak barrel aging]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalAgingMethod
Context triple: [Meursault Premier Cru, typicalAgingMethod, oak barrel aging]
  • A. typicalAgingTime
    Indicates the usual duration required for something to age or mature under normal conditions.
  • B. typicalAgingIndication
    Indicates that something serves as a sign or marker commonly associated with the normal process of aging.
  • C. mayBeAgedIn chosen
    Indicates that an entity has the potential or option to undergo an aging or maturation process in a specified medium, container, or environment.
  • D. typicalAgingCategory
    Indicates the general or most common aging classification that applies to an entity based on its usual age-related characteristics or stage.
  • E. ageProgression
    Indicates a temporal relationship where an entity’s age increases or advances over time.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224c65a348190baaed1c01a29900c completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c876524819098545e6037d3107d completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0379e5174c8190a0bdde7e381b7624 completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:56 p.m.