Triple
T30889046
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Imaginary Numbers in Geometry |
E786846
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | mathematical-philosophical work |
C3331
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: mathematical-philosophical work Context triple: [Imaginary Numbers in Geometry, instanceOf, mathematical-philosophical work]
-
A.
philosophy of mathematics work
chosen
A philosophy of mathematics work is a scholarly text that critically examines the nature, foundations, methods, and implications of mathematics from a philosophical perspective.
-
B.
mathematical work
A mathematical work is a structured intellectual creation that develops, analyzes, or communicates mathematical concepts, results, or methods, typically through definitions, theorems, proofs, and examples.
-
C.
philosophical work part
A philosophical work part is a distinct section or component of a philosophical text (such as a chapter, argument, or subsection) that contributes to the development of its overall ideas or theses.
-
D.
constructivist philosophy of mathematics
Constructivist philosophy of mathematics is the view that mathematical objects exist only through explicit mental or formal constructions, so a statement is true only if we can construct a proof or example of it.
-
E.
work of continental philosophy
A work of continental philosophy is a text that engages critically and often historically with questions of meaning, subjectivity, power, and culture, typically using interpretive, phenomenological, or dialectical methods rather than formal analytic argumentation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224bbfa7c81908448e0c261c523e3 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:49 p.m.