Triple
T30813022
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Elendil |
E784694
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableArtifactOwned |
P23131
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Palantíri |
E261182
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Palantíri | Statement: [Elendil, notableArtifactOwned, Palantíri]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableArtifactOwned Context triple: [Elendil, notableArtifactOwned, Palantíri]
-
A.
hasIconicArtifact
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a distinctive, emblematic artifact that represents its identity, history, or significance.
-
B.
notableArtifactPursued
Indicates that an entity actively seeks, hunts for, or attempts to obtain a particular notable artifact.
-
C.
notableRelic
Indicates that an entity is a historically or culturally significant relic associated with another entity (such as a place, person, or event).
-
D.
notableAsset
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with an asset that is particularly significant, prominent, or noteworthy in relation to it.
-
E.
usesCollectible
Indicates that one entity employs or makes use of a collectible item in performing an action or fulfilling a function.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224b4eda48190bd212ce4f3901e56 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c876524819098545e6037d3107d |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a28bbe1c2788190979975882d067e61 |
completed | June 10, 2026, 1:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379e2fac0819089b522db3260028c |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:43 p.m.