Triple
T30481881
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Canon EOS R5 |
E775608
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsUSBCharging |
P170788
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Canon EOS R5, supportsUSBCharging, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsUSBCharging Context triple: [Canon EOS R5, supportsUSBCharging, true]
-
A.
hasUSBCharging
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides or supports USB-based power charging capability for another entity or device.
-
B.
supportsChargingMethod
Indicates that one entity is compatible with and can operate using a specified charging method.
-
C.
supportsWirelessCharging
Indicates that one entity provides the capability for another entity to be charged without a physical wired connection, typically via inductive or similar wireless power transfer methods.
-
D.
supportsChargingStandard
Indicates that one entity is compatible with and able to operate using a specified charging standard defined by another entity.
-
E.
supportsChargingModel
Indicates that one entity is compatible with, or able to operate under, a specified charging or billing model.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f22497341481909c21ba329fadaa6b |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c876524819098545e6037d3107d |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379e2fac0819089b522db3260028c |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:12 p.m.