Triple
T30303361
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Amonasro |
E770708
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipToRadamès |
P203862
|
FINISHED |
| Object | opposes Radamès as enemy leader |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: opposes Radamès as enemy leader | Statement: [Amonasro, relationshipToRadamès, opposes Radamès as enemy leader]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToRadamès Context triple: [Amonasro, relationshipToRadamès, opposes Radamès as enemy leader]
-
A.
relationshipToEdmondDantès
Indicates the specific type of personal or social relationship an entity has with Edmond Dantès.
-
B.
relationshipToPriam
Indicates a familial or social connection that someone has specifically with Priam.
-
C.
relationshipToPriamAndHecuba
Indicates a familial or relational connection that an entity has specifically to both Priam and Hecuba.
-
D.
relationshipToHarpagon
Indicates the specific familial or social relationship that an entity has to the character Harpagon.
-
E.
relationshipToPármeno
Indicates the specific type of personal or social relationship that one entity has to Pármeno.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224881b948190b8c4921b250a44a3 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a0227ce59a081909fe1ba1181d86b4d |
completed | May 11, 2026, 7:02 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a02273989208190beb948b8c7bdaee3 |
completed | May 11, 2026, 7 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a0227cd6e348190983e90e349aa155b |
completed | May 11, 2026, 7:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:49 p.m.