Triple
T29341324
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | GrimE |
E744043
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedDeveloper |
P21964
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tim Schafer |
E752755
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tim Schafer | Statement: [GrimE, associatedDeveloper, Tim Schafer]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedDeveloper Context triple: [GrimE, associatedDeveloper, Tim Schafer]
-
A.
relatedDeveloperAPI
Indicates a relationship where one API is associated with, derived from, or otherwise connected to a particular developer-focused API.
-
B.
coDeveloperOf
Indicates that two or more entities jointly developed or collaborated in creating the same project, product, or work.
-
C.
majorDeveloper
chosen
Indicates that an entity is a primary or leading developer responsible for creating or significantly contributing to another entity.
-
D.
laterDeveloper
Indicates that one developer’s work, role, or involvement occurs after another developer in time.
-
E.
leadDeveloperAlias
Indicates that one entity serves as an alternative or alias name for the lead developer associated with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f09126cfcc8190899b16fbf3c2bf7b |
completed | April 28, 2026, 10:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a0356f541b08190b40469aa628087f4 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 4:36 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a26aa556d80819099f19385aaf3beda |
completed | June 8, 2026, 11:41 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a03569e4fa881909c57351a6c489636 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 4:34 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 1:34 p.m.