Triple

T28838831
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Graham Oppy E728257 entity
Predicate notableWork P4 FINISHED
Object Arguing About Gods
Arguing About Gods is a philosophical book by Graham Oppy that offers a rigorous, critical examination of the main arguments for and against the existence of God.
E1836216 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Arguing About Gods | Statement: [Graham Oppy, notableWork, Arguing About Gods]
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Arguing About Gods
Triple: [Graham Oppy, notableWork, Arguing About Gods]
Generated description
Arguing About Gods is a philosophical book by Graham Oppy that offers a rigorous, critical examination of the main arguments for and against the existence of God.

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f0319e8e7c8190b37288c8845b9dbc completed April 28, 2026, 4:03 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6597132cc8190a9a2fd336fd2d084 completed May 2, 2026, 8:07 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a24bbb33b048190a7af0e20b0350094 completed June 7, 2026, 12:30 a.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_6a24c12a5b548190aa6228a4fe0d200f completed June 7, 2026, 12:54 a.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_6a24c55ba59c81908fcfff015a36e2c0 completed June 7, 2026, 1:11 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 6:40 a.m.