Triple

T28612577
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject California Blue E724201 entity
Predicate associatedDeviceType P10596 FINISHED
Object smartphone LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: smartphone | Statement: [California Blue, associatedDeviceType, smartphone]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedDeviceType
Context triple: [California Blue, associatedDeviceType, smartphone]
  • A. relatedDevice
    Indicates that one device has an association or connection to another device, without specifying the exact nature of that relationship.
  • B. connectsDeviceType chosen
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is associated with or linked to a specific type or category of device.
  • C. targetedDeviceType
    Indicates the specific type or category of device that is the intended target of an action, configuration, or content.
  • D. relatedToDevice
    Indicates that there exists a general association or connection between an entity and a device, without specifying the exact nature of that relationship.
  • E. testedDeviceType
    Indicates that one entity is the type or category of device on which another entity has been tested.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f01d816d7c8190a1fe27e3434041dc completed April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a019dfc69fc8190b0d80279a6216ba7 completed May 11, 2026, 9:14 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a019d54586c81908292d4880db9fad2 completed May 11, 2026, 9:11 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:30 a.m.