Triple
T28273819
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Figures, a Reprise |
E712930
|
entity |
| Predicate | originalArtistOfRelatedWork |
P197620
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Jessie Reyez |
E189408
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jessie Reyez | Statement: [Figures, a Reprise, originalArtistOfRelatedWork, Jessie Reyez]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: originalArtistOfRelatedWork Context triple: [Figures, a Reprise, originalArtistOfRelatedWork, Jessie Reyez]
-
A.
originalArtistOfSourceWork
Indicates that one entity is the artist who created the original source work from which another work is derived or adapted.
-
B.
originalArtistNameCredit
Indicates that the credited name refers to the artist who originally created the work or recording.
-
C.
originalArtistType
Indicates the type or category of the artist who originally created the work or content.
-
D.
originalWorkBy
Indicates that one entity is the creator or originator of another entity (such as a work, idea, or product).
-
E.
originalArtistOfSong
Indicates that one entity is the artist who first created or performed the specified song.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69efb52275788190ae5181ccebef18ce |
completed | April 27, 2026, 7:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe9fb9735c8190a360b556c9d00b3f |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:45 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a2863ade8e0819088662c89d60dfc7c |
completed | June 9, 2026, 7:04 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe9eaa88008190a9b2a469dc685002 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:40 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fe9fb88db08190a8f4af350633330e |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 11:19 p.m.