Triple
T27772773
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mary Jane Girls |
E701796
|
entity |
| Predicate | bestKnownFor |
P22
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
hit single In My House
"In My House" is a mid-1980s funk-infused R&B hit by the Mary Jane Girls that became their signature and most commercially successful song.
|
E1788125
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: hit single In My House | Statement: [Mary Jane Girls, bestKnownFor, hit single In My House]
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: hit single In My House Triple: [Mary Jane Girls, bestKnownFor, hit single In My House]
Generated description
"In My House" is a mid-1980s funk-infused R&B hit by the Mary Jane Girls that became their signature and most commercially successful song.
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef6a52fa708190934a32308d2c92dc |
completed | April 27, 2026, 1:53 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f63797ab708190876c93bc93b05043 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:42 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a12ecbd5a308190bc56732476a508c6 |
completed | May 24, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_6a12edc0d3ec8190b8b1c8b16884ef64 |
completed | May 24, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_6a12ee4f57508190aa0d1832b30a9556 |
completed | May 24, 2026, 12:25 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 4:36 p.m.