Triple

T25828502
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Blindness and Insight E650596 entity
Predicate hasPart P35 FINISHED
Object essay "The Concept of Irony"
"The Concept of Irony" is a critical essay that examines the role and function of irony in literary texts, exploring how it shapes interpretation and reveals deeper layers of meaning.
E1699078 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: essay "The Concept of Irony" | Statement: [Blindness and Insight, hasPart, essay "The Concept of Irony"]
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: essay "The Concept of Irony"
Triple: [Blindness and Insight, hasPart, essay "The Concept of Irony"]
Generated description
"The Concept of Irony" is a critical essay that examines the role and function of irony in literary texts, exploring how it shapes interpretation and reveals deeper layers of meaning.

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e7ab37438081908f1ccf6284839520 completed April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6019807f08190bbeb8be744551fdf completed May 2, 2026, 1:52 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a10da29dc8c81909c3a7da5c2b43336 completed May 22, 2026, 10:35 p.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_6a10dc6fb1508190a14c70bbe0302671 completed May 22, 2026, 10:45 p.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_6a10dd08394081908d41ab46ad30a279 completed May 22, 2026, 10:47 p.m.
Created at: April 22, 2026, 7:37 a.m.