Triple
T25621320
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | John Paul Stevens |
E642302
|
entity |
| Predicate | appointedToCourtByParty |
P163693
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Republican Party |
E771
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Republican Party | Statement: [John Paul Stevens, appointedToCourtByParty, Republican Party]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appointedToCourtByParty Context triple: [John Paul Stevens, appointedToCourtByParty, Republican Party]
-
A.
appointedToCourtOfFederalClaimsBy
Indicates that one entity formally selected and installed another entity as a judge on the United States Court of Federal Claims.
-
B.
appointedWithin
Indicates that one entity was formally appointed to a role, position, or office inside the organizational, temporal, or structural bounds defined by another entity.
-
C.
appointedThrough
Indicates that an entity attained a position, role, or status by means of a specific appointing process, mechanism, or intermediary.
-
D.
appointedWith
Indicates that one entity has been formally assigned or designated to a role, position, or responsibility in relation to another entity.
-
E.
partyToCase
Indicates that an entity is involved in a legal case as one of its formal participants (e.g., plaintiff, defendant, or other party).
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e77e7a96748190b10f2699041e4e43 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6397b64f881909d811225e57aac5e |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:50 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a10d9f2122c8190bcaaaf491617537f |
completed | May 22, 2026, 10:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f63706b6008190993577193c85ff50 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:40 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f638d029148190877c103f0eeaf147 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 5:05 p.m.