Triple

T24793235
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Madura cultural region E620306 entity
Predicate hasLegalCustom P3013 FINISHED
Object adat (customary law) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: adat (customary law) | Statement: [Madura cultural region, hasLegalCustom, adat (customary law)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLegalCustom
Context triple: [Madura cultural region, hasLegalCustom, adat (customary law)]
  • A. hasLegalCodeCharacteristic
    Indicates that a legal code possesses a specified characteristic, feature, or property.
  • B. hasLegalSubject
    Indicates that an entity serves as the legal subject (e.g., rights-holder or obligated party) in a legal relationship or context.
  • C. legalIn
    Indicates that an action, status, or entity is permitted or valid under the laws or regulations of a specified jurisdiction.
  • D. hasLegalRight
    Indicates that an entity possesses an officially recognized legal entitlement or permission to perform an action or hold a claim regarding another entity.
  • E. usesLegalCode chosen
    Indicates that one entity applies, references, or operates under a particular legal code in its actions or regulations.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2fabe77c8819085f7ce6486248139 completed April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f44a417a58819081777e18dda149fd completed May 1, 2026, 6:37 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f442a977b08190b44eac040cb90211 completed May 1, 2026, 6:05 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 4:47 a.m.