Triple
T24423098
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Stabroek |
E615777
|
entity |
| Predicate | colonialPowerDuringNameUse |
P130899
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Dutch Republic |
E161
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dutch Republic | Statement: [Stabroek, colonialPowerDuringNameUse, Dutch Republic]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: colonialPowerDuringNameUse Context triple: [Stabroek, colonialPowerDuringNameUse, Dutch Republic]
-
A.
colonialNameUsedBy
Indicates that a colonial-era name for a place, group, or entity is used or applied by a particular agent or source.
-
B.
colonialPowerBefore
Indicates that one entity served as the colonial ruling power over another entity during an earlier, preceding time period.
-
C.
colonialPowerAfter
Indicates that one entity became the colonial ruler of another entity after a specified time or event, succeeding a previous colonial authority.
-
D.
colonialPowerInHistory
chosen
Indicates that one entity historically exercised colonial control, dominance, or governance over another entity.
-
E.
colonialPowerInvolved
Indicates that a colonial power is involved in, influences, or exerts control over the referenced situation, event, or relationship.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2d7eadb248190a867130fe45f0388 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f296a4285881909376560f1cf4bf62 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 11:39 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a0fe36e5eac8190af3511c0b1d23c64 |
completed | May 22, 2026, 5:02 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f287cc4fd4819081e93cc638d9512d |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:35 p.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:14 a.m.