Triple

T23599875
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Canadian Aboriginal law E582721 entity
Predicate keyCase P4528 FINISHED
Object Daniels v Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development)
Daniels v Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development) is a landmark 2016 Supreme Court of Canada decision that held Métis and non‑status Indians fall under federal jurisdiction as “Indians” under section 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867.
E1594558 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Daniels v Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development) | Statement: [Canadian Aboriginal law, keyCase, Daniels v Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development)]
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Daniels v Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development)
Triple: [Canadian Aboriginal law, keyCase, Daniels v Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development)]
Generated description
Daniels v Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development) is a landmark 2016 Supreme Court of Canada decision that held Métis and non‑status Indians fall under federal jurisdiction as “Indians” under section 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867.

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e248faa2788190abb1581742daa6aa completed April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1b0929c548190bb42621d1131d87f completed April 29, 2026, 7:17 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a0f4584e1a881909542ccd283d9db76 completed May 21, 2026, 5:48 p.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_6a0f46d5885c819098231e2178e6606e completed May 21, 2026, 5:54 p.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_6a0f47b410e8819093c7578df50bd669 completed May 21, 2026, 5:58 p.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:43 p.m.