Triple
T23599871
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Canadian Aboriginal law |
E582721
|
entity |
| Predicate | keyCase |
P4528
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Haida Nation v British Columbia (Minister of Forests)
Haida Nation v British Columbia (Minister of Forests) is a landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision that established the Crown’s duty to consult and, where appropriate, accommodate Indigenous peoples before actions that may affect their asserted Aboriginal rights or title.
|
E1594557
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Haida Nation v British Columbia (Minister of Forests) | Statement: [Canadian Aboriginal law, keyCase, Haida Nation v British Columbia (Minister of Forests)]
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Haida Nation v British Columbia (Minister of Forests) Triple: [Canadian Aboriginal law, keyCase, Haida Nation v British Columbia (Minister of Forests)]
Generated description
Haida Nation v British Columbia (Minister of Forests) is a landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision that established the Crown’s duty to consult and, where appropriate, accommodate Indigenous peoples before actions that may affect their asserted Aboriginal rights or title.
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e248faa2788190abb1581742daa6aa |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1b0929c548190bb42621d1131d87f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 7:17 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a0f4584e1a881909542ccd283d9db76 |
completed | May 21, 2026, 5:48 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_6a0f46d5885c819098231e2178e6606e |
completed | May 21, 2026, 5:54 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_6a0f47b410e8819093c7578df50bd669 |
completed | May 21, 2026, 5:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:43 p.m.