Triple

T23566231

Position	Surface form	Disambiguated ID	Type / Status
Subject	Lord Mansfield	`E579376`	entity
Predicate	knownFor	`P22`	FINISHED
Object	Pillans v Van Mierop Pillans v Van Mierop is an 18th-century English contract law case notable for Lord Mansfield’s influential discussion of consideration and the enforceability of promises in commercial transactions.	`E1596576`	NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini

Instruction

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Input

Phrase: Pillans v Van Mierop | Statement: [Lord Mansfield, knownFor, Pillans v Van Mierop]

NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1

Instruction

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Input

Entity: Pillans v Van Mierop
Triple: [Lord Mansfield, knownFor, Pillans v Van Mierop]

Generated description

Pillans v Van Mierop is an 18th-century English contract law case notable for Lord Mansfield’s influential discussion of consideration and the enforceability of promises in commercial transactions.

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step	Stage	Batch ID	Status	When
creating	Elicitation	`batch_69e245fe24588190888f3aec8407d8e3`	completed	April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m.
NER	Named-entity recognition	`batch_69f1af6c2930819090bc2b95725fbf18`	completed	April 29, 2026, 7:12 a.m.
NED1	Entity disambiguation (via context triple)	`batch_6a0f4565a7b4819085ebb7e7cd516d41`	completed	May 21, 2026, 5:48 p.m.
NEDg	Description generation	`batch_6a0f49416f348190909aa4b99389c9d7`	completed	May 21, 2026, 6:04 p.m.
NED2	Entity disambiguation (via description)	`batch_6a0f4a15867c8190ba3268c241754707`	completed	May 21, 2026, 6:08 p.m.

Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:35 p.m.