Triple
T23472554
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Barry Reed |
E570166
|
entity |
| Predicate | memberOf |
P10
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Massachusetts Bar |
E3702
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Massachusetts Bar | Statement: [Barry Reed, memberOf, Massachusetts Bar]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Massachusetts Bar Context triple: [Barry Reed, memberOf, Massachusetts Bar]
-
A.
Massachusetts Bar
chosen
The Massachusetts Bar is the professional body and licensing authority for attorneys authorized to practice law in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
-
B.
Rhode Island Bar
The Rhode Island Bar is the professional licensing organization and regulatory body for attorneys authorized to practice law in the state of Rhode Island.
-
C.
New Hampshire Bar
The New Hampshire Bar is the professional organization and licensing authority for attorneys authorized to practice law in the state of New Hampshire.
-
D.
Maryland Bar
The Maryland Bar is the professional association and licensing body for attorneys authorized to practice law in the state of Maryland.
-
E.
Connecticut Bar
The Connecticut Bar is the professional body of licensed attorneys authorized to practice law in the state of Connecticut.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245af8a88819084f2704f6d265a92 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1a70244208190bbd8f58ac16d4399 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 6:36 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a0c82604cc08190b36c6b9636b6bf42 |
completed | May 19, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:55 p.m.