Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Olmstead v. L.C. (1999) | Statement: [Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, interpretedBy, Olmstead v. L.C. (1999)]

Target entity: Olmstead v. L.C. (1999)
Context triple: [Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, interpretedBy, Olmstead v. L.C. (1999)]

• A. Olmstead v. United States
  Olmstead v. United States was a 1928 U.S. Supreme Court case that held warrantless wiretapping did not violate the Fourth Amendment, a stance later curtailed by modern privacy jurisprudence.
• B. Alden v. Maine
  Alden v. Maine is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded state sovereign immunity by holding that states are generally immune from private suits for damages in their own courts under federal law.
• C. Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman
  Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that limited federal court authority over state institutions by holding that the Eleventh Amendment bars federal courts from ordering state officials to comply with state law.
• D. Regan v. Wald
  Regan v. Wald is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal restrictions on travel to Cuba, affirming broad executive authority over foreign affairs and economic sanctions.
• E. Employment Division v. Smith
  Employment Division v. Smith is a landmark 1990 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed protections for religious practices under the Free Exercise Clause by upholding the enforcement of neutral, generally applicable laws even when they incidentally burden religion.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: Olmstead v. L.C. (1999)
Triple: [Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, interpretedBy, Olmstead v. L.C. (1999)]

Olmstead v. L.C. (1999) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that held unjustified segregation of people with disabilities in institutions violates the Americans with Disabilities Act’s integration mandate.

Target entity: Olmstead v. L.C. (1999)
Target entity description: Olmstead v. L.C. (1999) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that held unjustified segregation of people with disabilities in institutions violates the Americans with Disabilities Act’s integration mandate.

• A. Olmstead v. United States
  Olmstead v. United States was a 1928 U.S. Supreme Court case that held warrantless wiretapping did not violate the Fourth Amendment, a stance later curtailed by modern privacy jurisprudence.
• B. Alden v. Maine
  Alden v. Maine is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded state sovereign immunity by holding that states are generally immune from private suits for damages in their own courts under federal law.
• C. Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman
  Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that limited federal court authority over state institutions by holding that the Eleventh Amendment bars federal courts from ordering state officials to comply with state law.
• D. Regan v. Wald
  Regan v. Wald is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal restrictions on travel to Cuba, affirming broad executive authority over foreign affairs and economic sanctions.
• E. Employment Division v. Smith
  Employment Division v. Smith is a landmark 1990 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed protections for religious practices under the Free Exercise Clause by upholding the enforcement of neutral, generally applicable laws even when they incidentally burden religion.
• F. None of above. chosen