Triple
T22192854
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Indiana Constitution Article 1 Section 5 |
E548471
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasInterpretationHistory |
P9770
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Indiana Supreme Court jurisprudence on elections
Indiana Supreme Court jurisprudence on elections comprises the body of state high court decisions interpreting and applying Indiana’s constitutional provisions and legal standards governing the conduct, validity, and regulation of elections.
|
E1523980
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (5 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Indiana Supreme Court jurisprudence on elections | Statement: [Indiana Constitution Article 1 Section 5, hasInterpretationHistory, Indiana Supreme Court jurisprudence on elections]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Indiana Supreme Court jurisprudence on elections Context triple: [Indiana Constitution Article 1 Section 5, hasInterpretationHistory, Indiana Supreme Court jurisprudence on elections]
-
A.
The Same Subject Continued: The Powers of Congress to Regulate the Election of Members
"The Same Subject Continued: The Powers of Congress to Regulate the Election of Members" is an essay in The Federalist Papers, written by Alexander Hamilton, that defends and explains the constitutional authority of Congress over the regulation of congressional elections.
-
B.
McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission
McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down an Ohio law banning anonymous political leaflets, affirming First Amendment protection for anonymous political speech.
-
C.
The Michigan model of voting
The Michigan model of voting is a political science framework that explains voters’ choices primarily through long-term psychological attachments to political parties, shaped by socialization and group identities.
-
D.
Iowa merit selection system for judges
The Iowa merit selection system for judges is a nonpartisan process that uses nominating commissions to screen and recommend judicial candidates based on qualifications rather than partisan elections.
-
E.
Timbs v. Indiana
Timbs v. Indiana is a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Indiana Supreme Court jurisprudence on elections Triple: [Indiana Constitution Article 1 Section 5, hasInterpretationHistory, Indiana Supreme Court jurisprudence on elections]
Generated description
Indiana Supreme Court jurisprudence on elections comprises the body of state high court decisions interpreting and applying Indiana’s constitutional provisions and legal standards governing the conduct, validity, and regulation of elections.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Indiana Supreme Court jurisprudence on elections Target entity description: Indiana Supreme Court jurisprudence on elections comprises the body of state high court decisions interpreting and applying Indiana’s constitutional provisions and legal standards governing the conduct, validity, and regulation of elections.
-
A.
The Same Subject Continued: The Powers of Congress to Regulate the Election of Members
"The Same Subject Continued: The Powers of Congress to Regulate the Election of Members" is an essay in The Federalist Papers, written by Alexander Hamilton, that defends and explains the constitutional authority of Congress over the regulation of congressional elections.
-
B.
McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission
McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down an Ohio law banning anonymous political leaflets, affirming First Amendment protection for anonymous political speech.
-
C.
The Michigan model of voting
The Michigan model of voting is a political science framework that explains voters’ choices primarily through long-term psychological attachments to political parties, shaped by socialization and group identities.
-
D.
Iowa merit selection system for judges
The Iowa merit selection system for judges is a nonpartisan process that uses nominating commissions to screen and recommend judicial candidates based on qualifications rather than partisan elections.
-
E.
Timbs v. Indiana
Timbs v. Indiana is a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
- F. None of above. chosen
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasInterpretationHistory Context triple: [Indiana Constitution Article 1 Section 5, hasInterpretationHistory, Indiana Supreme Court jurisprudence on elections]
-
A.
interpretationHistory
Indicates the sequence of prior interpretations or readings that have been assigned to something over time.
-
B.
historicallyInterpretedBy
chosen
Indicates that something (such as an event, text, or phenomenon) has been given meaning, explanation, or understanding by a particular historian, group, or interpretive tradition over time.
-
C.
hasHistoryNote
Indicates that there is an associated historical note or record describing past events, changes, or context related to the subject.
-
D.
hasHistoryIn
Indicates that an entity has a past involvement, presence, or record of activity within a particular domain, context, or location.
-
E.
hasLabelHistory
Indicates that an entity is associated with a record of its past labels, including changes over time.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (6 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e3e0c7c8190b30d278845e2497e |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f12ae552908190b38c3d765bcfb68a |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a0aa60e47c881909096698dd7d82e7f |
completed | May 18, 2026, 5:39 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_6a0aa6c001d48190b49866f02514aa28 |
completed | May 18, 2026, 5:42 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_6a0aa74204a081909fa0d80858bfa6bb |
completed | May 18, 2026, 5:44 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e71b48576c8190a8e93738fd9cfda5 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 6:38 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:35 p.m.