Triple

T22192854
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Indiana Constitution Article 1 Section 5 E548471 entity
Predicate hasInterpretationHistory P9770 FINISHED
Object Indiana Supreme Court jurisprudence on elections
Indiana Supreme Court jurisprudence on elections comprises the body of state high court decisions interpreting and applying Indiana’s constitutional provisions and legal standards governing the conduct, validity, and regulation of elections.
E1523980 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (5 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Indiana Supreme Court jurisprudence on elections | Statement: [Indiana Constitution Article 1 Section 5, hasInterpretationHistory, Indiana Supreme Court jurisprudence on elections]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Indiana Supreme Court jurisprudence on elections
Context triple: [Indiana Constitution Article 1 Section 5, hasInterpretationHistory, Indiana Supreme Court jurisprudence on elections]
  • A. The Same Subject Continued: The Powers of Congress to Regulate the Election of Members
    "The Same Subject Continued: The Powers of Congress to Regulate the Election of Members" is an essay in The Federalist Papers, written by Alexander Hamilton, that defends and explains the constitutional authority of Congress over the regulation of congressional elections.
  • B. McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission
    McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down an Ohio law banning anonymous political leaflets, affirming First Amendment protection for anonymous political speech.
  • C. The Michigan model of voting
    The Michigan model of voting is a political science framework that explains voters’ choices primarily through long-term psychological attachments to political parties, shaped by socialization and group identities.
  • D. Iowa merit selection system for judges
    The Iowa merit selection system for judges is a nonpartisan process that uses nominating commissions to screen and recommend judicial candidates based on qualifications rather than partisan elections.
  • E. Timbs v. Indiana
    Timbs v. Indiana is a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Indiana Supreme Court jurisprudence on elections
Triple: [Indiana Constitution Article 1 Section 5, hasInterpretationHistory, Indiana Supreme Court jurisprudence on elections]
Generated description
Indiana Supreme Court jurisprudence on elections comprises the body of state high court decisions interpreting and applying Indiana’s constitutional provisions and legal standards governing the conduct, validity, and regulation of elections.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Indiana Supreme Court jurisprudence on elections
Target entity description: Indiana Supreme Court jurisprudence on elections comprises the body of state high court decisions interpreting and applying Indiana’s constitutional provisions and legal standards governing the conduct, validity, and regulation of elections.
  • A. The Same Subject Continued: The Powers of Congress to Regulate the Election of Members
    "The Same Subject Continued: The Powers of Congress to Regulate the Election of Members" is an essay in The Federalist Papers, written by Alexander Hamilton, that defends and explains the constitutional authority of Congress over the regulation of congressional elections.
  • B. McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission
    McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down an Ohio law banning anonymous political leaflets, affirming First Amendment protection for anonymous political speech.
  • C. The Michigan model of voting
    The Michigan model of voting is a political science framework that explains voters’ choices primarily through long-term psychological attachments to political parties, shaped by socialization and group identities.
  • D. Iowa merit selection system for judges
    The Iowa merit selection system for judges is a nonpartisan process that uses nominating commissions to screen and recommend judicial candidates based on qualifications rather than partisan elections.
  • E. Timbs v. Indiana
    Timbs v. Indiana is a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • F. None of above. chosen
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasInterpretationHistory
Context triple: [Indiana Constitution Article 1 Section 5, hasInterpretationHistory, Indiana Supreme Court jurisprudence on elections]
  • A. interpretationHistory
    Indicates the sequence of prior interpretations or readings that have been assigned to something over time.
  • B. historicallyInterpretedBy chosen
    Indicates that something (such as an event, text, or phenomenon) has been given meaning, explanation, or understanding by a particular historian, group, or interpretive tradition over time.
  • C. hasHistoryNote
    Indicates that there is an associated historical note or record describing past events, changes, or context related to the subject.
  • D. hasHistoryIn
    Indicates that an entity has a past involvement, presence, or record of activity within a particular domain, context, or location.
  • E. hasLabelHistory
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a record of its past labels, including changes over time.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (6 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e3e0c7c8190b30d278845e2497e completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f12ae552908190b38c3d765bcfb68a completed April 28, 2026, 9:47 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a0aa60e47c881909096698dd7d82e7f completed May 18, 2026, 5:39 a.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_6a0aa6c001d48190b49866f02514aa28 completed May 18, 2026, 5:42 a.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_6a0aa74204a081909fa0d80858bfa6bb completed May 18, 2026, 5:44 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e71b48576c8190a8e93738fd9cfda5 completed April 21, 2026, 6:38 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:35 p.m.