Triple
T20856537
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sudbury mining camp |
E513494
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Garson Mine
Garson Mine is an underground nickel and copper mine located in the Sudbury mining district of Ontario, Canada.
|
E1456226
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Garson Mine | Statement: [Sudbury mining camp, contains, Garson Mine]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Garson Mine Context triple: [Sudbury mining camp, contains, Garson Mine]
-
A.
Tioga Mine
Tioga Mine was a historic silver mining operation in the Sierra Nevada of California that gave its name to nearby Tioga Pass.
-
B.
Capps Mine
Capps Mine is a historically significant gold mine in North Carolina known for its role in the state’s early gold-mining industry.
-
C.
Jackson Mine
Jackson Mine is a historic iron ore mine in Michigan’s Marquette Iron Range that played a key role in the early development of the American iron mining industry.
-
D.
Hollinger Mine
Hollinger Mine was one of the largest and most productive gold mines in Canada, central to the development of Timmins, Ontario and the Porcupine mining district.
-
E.
Pioneer Mine
Pioneer Mine is an iron ore mine located in Minnesota’s Vermilion Range, historically part of the early iron mining industry in the Lake Superior region.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Garson Mine Triple: [Sudbury mining camp, contains, Garson Mine]
Generated description
Garson Mine is an underground nickel and copper mine located in the Sudbury mining district of Ontario, Canada.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Garson Mine Target entity description: Garson Mine is an underground nickel and copper mine located in the Sudbury mining district of Ontario, Canada.
-
A.
Tioga Mine
Tioga Mine was a historic silver mining operation in the Sierra Nevada of California that gave its name to nearby Tioga Pass.
-
B.
Capps Mine
Capps Mine is a historically significant gold mine in North Carolina known for its role in the state’s early gold-mining industry.
-
C.
Jackson Mine
Jackson Mine is a historic iron ore mine in Michigan’s Marquette Iron Range that played a key role in the early development of the American iron mining industry.
-
D.
Hollinger Mine
Hollinger Mine was one of the largest and most productive gold mines in Canada, central to the development of Timmins, Ontario and the Porcupine mining district.
-
E.
Pioneer Mine
Pioneer Mine is an iron ore mine located in Minnesota’s Vermilion Range, historically part of the early iron mining industry in the Lake Superior region.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4f5b01081909452f654d2fc3f50 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6c3a93ea881909b9f80a9bd0605b6 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 12:24 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a0918bfe53c819096ac1ae18090c015 |
completed | May 17, 2026, 1:24 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_6a0919608d148190aaf1abee12fe8935 |
completed | May 17, 2026, 1:26 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_6a0919f58008819097e05a187ed4b3de |
completed | May 17, 2026, 1:29 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:44 p.m.