Triple

T20827524
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Abraham D. Shapiro E512742 entity
Predicate partyToLegalCase P15954 FINISHED
Object Shapiro v. Thompson E118716 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Shapiro v. Thompson | Statement: [Abraham D. Shapiro, partyToLegalCase, Shapiro v. Thompson]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Shapiro v. Thompson
Context triple: [Abraham D. Shapiro, partyToLegalCase, Shapiro v. Thompson]
  • A. Shapiro v. Thompson chosen
    Shapiro v. Thompson is a landmark 1969 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down state laws imposing durational residency requirements for welfare benefits as violations of the constitutional right to travel and equal protection.
  • B. Bolling v. Sharpe
    Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
  • C. Maples v. Thomas
    Maples v. Thomas is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a death row inmate could overcome a procedural default because his attorneys had effectively abandoned him, constituting cause to excuse the default.
  • D. Shaw v. Hunt
    Shaw v. Hunt is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that further developed the Court’s racial gerrymandering jurisprudence by applying and extending the principles first articulated in Shaw v. Reno.
  • E. Gooding v. Wilson
    Gooding v. Wilson is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the “fighting words” doctrine and struck down a Georgia statute as unconstitutionally overbroad under the First Amendment.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4ce39108190a6e8e5df4f1c8dc5 completed April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6c2fe54608190a061274bf4316610 completed April 21, 2026, 12:21 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a090afb35248190920cb47cfc313be9 completed May 17, 2026, 12:25 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:42 p.m.