Triple
T20667132
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Vivian Marie Thompson |
E507921
|
entity |
| Predicate | partyToCase |
P15954
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Shapiro v. Thompson |
E118716
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Shapiro v. Thompson | Statement: [Vivian Marie Thompson, partyToCase, Shapiro v. Thompson]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Shapiro v. Thompson Context triple: [Vivian Marie Thompson, partyToCase, Shapiro v. Thompson]
-
A.
Shapiro v. Thompson
chosen
Shapiro v. Thompson is a landmark 1969 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down state laws imposing durational residency requirements for welfare benefits as violations of the constitutional right to travel and equal protection.
-
B.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
C.
Maples v. Thomas
Maples v. Thomas is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a death row inmate could overcome a procedural default because his attorneys had effectively abandoned him, constituting cause to excuse the default.
-
D.
Shaw v. Hunt
Shaw v. Hunt is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that further developed the Court’s racial gerrymandering jurisprudence by applying and extending the principles first articulated in Shaw v. Reno.
-
E.
Gooding v. Wilson
Gooding v. Wilson is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the “fighting words” doctrine and struck down a Georgia statute as unconstitutionally overbroad under the First Amendment.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4c059bc81908ea762cd73ea4424 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6b5c39dd48190965d65537592aef6 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 11:24 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a08cd6271e481909e3a6f10ec40ce11 |
completed | May 16, 2026, 8:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:44 a.m.