Triple

T20611993
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Constitution of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia E506469 entity
Predicate establishesInstitution P1833 FINISHED
Object federal constitutional court of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
The federal constitutional court of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was the highest judicial body responsible for interpreting the federal constitution and adjudicating constitutional disputes within the Yugoslav federation.
E1440552 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (4 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: federal constitutional court of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia | Statement: [Constitution of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, establishesInstitution, federal constitutional court of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: federal constitutional court of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
Context triple: [Constitution of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, establishesInstitution, federal constitutional court of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia]
  • A. Constitutional Court of Serbia
    The Constitutional Court of Serbia is the highest judicial body responsible for reviewing the constitutionality of laws and acts, protecting human and minority rights, and resolving constitutional disputes within the Republic of Serbia.
  • B. Constitutional Court of Republika Srpska
    The Constitutional Court of Republika Srpska is the highest judicial body in the Republika Srpska entity of Bosnia and Herzegovina responsible for interpreting its constitution and reviewing the constitutionality of laws and regulations.
  • C. Court of Serbia and Montenegro
    The Court of Serbia and Montenegro was the highest judicial authority of the former State Union of Serbia and Montenegro, responsible for overseeing the application and interpretation of federal law until the union’s dissolution in 2006.
  • D. Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina
    The Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina is the country’s highest judicial authority for constitutional matters, responsible for interpreting the constitution and resolving disputes between state institutions and levels of government.
  • E. constitutional court of Montenegro
    The Constitutional Court of Montenegro is the highest judicial body responsible for reviewing the constitutionality of laws and acts, protecting human rights, and ensuring adherence to the country’s constitutional order.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: federal constitutional court of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
Triple: [Constitution of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, establishesInstitution, federal constitutional court of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia]
Generated description
The federal constitutional court of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was the highest judicial body responsible for interpreting the federal constitution and adjudicating constitutional disputes within the Yugoslav federation.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: federal constitutional court of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
Target entity description: The federal constitutional court of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was the highest judicial body responsible for interpreting the federal constitution and adjudicating constitutional disputes within the Yugoslav federation.
  • A. Constitutional Court of Serbia
    The Constitutional Court of Serbia is the highest judicial body responsible for reviewing the constitutionality of laws and acts, protecting human and minority rights, and resolving constitutional disputes within the Republic of Serbia.
  • B. Constitutional Court of Republika Srpska
    The Constitutional Court of Republika Srpska is the highest judicial body in the Republika Srpska entity of Bosnia and Herzegovina responsible for interpreting its constitution and reviewing the constitutionality of laws and regulations.
  • C. Court of Serbia and Montenegro
    The Court of Serbia and Montenegro was the highest judicial authority of the former State Union of Serbia and Montenegro, responsible for overseeing the application and interpretation of federal law until the union’s dissolution in 2006.
  • D. Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina
    The Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina is the country’s highest judicial authority for constitutional matters, responsible for interpreting the constitution and resolving disputes between state institutions and levels of government.
  • E. constitutional court of Montenegro
    The Constitutional Court of Montenegro is the highest judicial body responsible for reviewing the constitutionality of laws and acts, protecting human rights, and ensuring adherence to the country’s constitutional order.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4bb2b4081908fa4a72444120f35 completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6aad81bdc8190aa6f6164f406a468 completed April 20, 2026, 10:38 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a08bb0eddac8190bfcd11ff358937f4 completed May 16, 2026, 6:44 p.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_6a08bb6fcfd08190946b0ed54a90e6b2 completed May 16, 2026, 6:46 p.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_6a08bbe309f4819092fc1c95b91562c1 completed May 16, 2026, 6:48 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:41 a.m.