Triple
T20584461
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sieradz County |
E505747
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasBorderWith |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Turek County |
E1009303
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Turek County | Statement: [Sieradz County, hasBorderWith, Turek County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Turek County Context triple: [Sieradz County, hasBorderWith, Turek County]
-
A.
Turek County
chosen
Turek County is an administrative district in west-central Poland, located in the Greater Poland Voivodeship.
-
B.
Olecko County
Olecko County is an administrative district (powiat) in the Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship of northeastern Poland, with the town of Olecko as its seat.
-
C.
Stężyca County
Stężyca County was a historical administrative district located within the former Sandomierz Voivodeship in the Kingdom of Poland.
-
D.
Wołów County
Wołów County is an administrative district in southwestern Poland’s Lower Silesian Voivodeship, encompassing towns such as Wołów and Brzeg Dolny.
-
E.
Sokółka County
Sokółka County is an administrative district in northeastern Poland’s Podlaskie Voivodeship, known for its rural character and proximity to the Belarusian border.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4b9669c8190b8e81fc72817d42c |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6a975f098819083700593a9fa6cd0 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:32 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a09cfd76e4081908de738aa0184c8d3 |
completed | May 17, 2026, 2:25 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:40 a.m.