Triple
T20584455
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sieradz County |
E505747
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasBorderWith |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Poddębice County |
E500647
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Poddębice County | Statement: [Sieradz County, hasBorderWith, Poddębice County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Poddębice County Context triple: [Sieradz County, hasBorderWith, Poddębice County]
-
A.
Poddębice County
chosen
Poddębice County is an administrative district in central Poland, with its seat in the town of Poddębice.
-
B.
Parczew County
Parczew County is an administrative district (powiat) in eastern Poland’s Lublin Voivodeship, centered on the town of Parczew and comprising surrounding rural areas.
-
C.
Pszczyna County
Pszczyna County is an administrative district in the Silesian Voivodeship of southern Poland, known for its historic town of Pszczyna and proximity to major urban and industrial centers.
-
D.
Sulęcin County
Sulęcin County is a local government and administrative district (powiat) in western Poland’s Lubusz Voivodeship.
-
E.
Chojnice County
Chojnice County is an administrative district in northern Poland’s Pomeranian Voivodeship, known for its lakes, forests, and tourism within the Kashubian region.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4b9669c8190b8e81fc72817d42c |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6a975f098819083700593a9fa6cd0 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:32 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a0acc773908819084b8d3ef0479e796 |
completed | May 18, 2026, 8:23 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:40 a.m.