Triple

T20305327
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject The Allegory of Christian Virtue and Vice E505594 entity
Predicate usesSymbolismFor P129 FINISHED
Object virtue LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: virtue | Statement: [The Allegory of Christian Virtue and Vice, usesSymbolismFor, virtue]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesSymbolismFor
Context triple: [The Allegory of Christian Virtue and Vice, usesSymbolismFor, virtue]
  • A. incorporatesSymbolismFrom
    Indicates that one entity includes or integrates symbolic elements, motifs, or meanings derived from another entity.
  • B. symbolismIn
    Indicates that one entity functions as a symbol or representation within the context, meaning, or interpretive framework of another entity.
  • C. symbolismFocus
    Indicates that the primary emphasis of a work, element, or representation is on its symbolic meaning rather than its literal or functional aspects.
  • D. shapeSymbolism
    Indicates how a particular shape is associated with or conveys symbolic meaning within a given context.
  • E. symbolizes chosen
    Indicates that one entity stands for, represents, or is used as a sign for another entity, concept, or idea.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4b8ab648190906e18538c250148 completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6773f8f688190b616f972b9bbb28e completed April 20, 2026, 6:58 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e55b21b09081909e46691b6f45a07f completed April 19, 2026, 10:45 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:18 a.m.