Triple
T20302103
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fort Andrews |
E505506
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasBattery |
P8164
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Battery Putnam
Battery Putnam is a former coastal artillery battery that was part of the coastal defenses at Fort Andrews in Massachusetts.
|
E1423970
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Battery Putnam | Statement: [Fort Andrews, hasBattery, Battery Putnam]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Battery Putnam Context triple: [Fort Andrews, hasBattery, Battery Putnam]
-
A.
Battery Duane
Battery Duane was a coastal artillery battery that formed part of the historic harbor defense system protecting New York City.
-
B.
Battery Hays
Battery Hays is a historic coastal artillery battery located within New Hampshire’s Fort Stark Historic Site, once part of the seacoast defense system.
-
C.
Battery Granger
Battery Granger was a coastal artillery battery that formed part of the historic harbor defense system protecting New York City.
-
D.
Battery Whiting
Battery Whiting was a coastal artillery fortification that formed part of the historic harbor defense system protecting New York City.
-
E.
Battery Carroll
Battery Carroll is a historic coastal artillery battery that forms part of Washington, D.C.’s Fort Circle Parks defensive system dating from the Civil War era.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Battery Putnam Triple: [Fort Andrews, hasBattery, Battery Putnam]
Generated description
Battery Putnam is a former coastal artillery battery that was part of the coastal defenses at Fort Andrews in Massachusetts.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Battery Putnam Target entity description: Battery Putnam is a former coastal artillery battery that was part of the coastal defenses at Fort Andrews in Massachusetts.
-
A.
Battery Duane
Battery Duane was a coastal artillery battery that formed part of the historic harbor defense system protecting New York City.
-
B.
Battery Hays
Battery Hays is a historic coastal artillery battery located within New Hampshire’s Fort Stark Historic Site, once part of the seacoast defense system.
-
C.
Battery Granger
Battery Granger was a coastal artillery battery that formed part of the historic harbor defense system protecting New York City.
-
D.
Battery Whiting
Battery Whiting was a coastal artillery fortification that formed part of the historic harbor defense system protecting New York City.
-
E.
Battery Carroll
Battery Carroll is a historic coastal artillery battery that forms part of Washington, D.C.’s Fort Circle Parks defensive system dating from the Civil War era.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4b8ab648190906e18538c250148 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6770d82b48190b21ce7c52ec6d5a0 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:57 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a08611762e481909ee2f41434c86aa5 |
completed | May 16, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_6a0863506f4481909c106c49f6b71191 |
completed | May 16, 2026, 12:30 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_6a0863f4bb788190b6ef1fe57279badb |
completed | May 16, 2026, 12:32 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:17 a.m.