Triple
T19961435
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Texas v. New Mexico |
E479822
|
entity |
| Predicate | holding |
P2237
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
United States may pursue claims to enforce the Rio Grande Compact
"United States may pursue claims to enforce the Rio Grande Compact" is a legal holding recognizing the federal government's authority to bring claims ensuring compliance with the interstate water-sharing agreement governing the Rio Grande.
|
E1403687
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States may pursue claims to enforce the Rio Grande Compact | Statement: [Texas v. New Mexico, holding, United States may pursue claims to enforce the Rio Grande Compact]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States may pursue claims to enforce the Rio Grande Compact Context triple: [Texas v. New Mexico, holding, United States may pursue claims to enforce the Rio Grande Compact]
-
A.
Upper Basin states of the Colorado River Compact
The Upper Basin states of the Colorado River Compact are the U.S. states in the upper portion of the Colorado River watershed—primarily Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, and New Mexico—that share and manage the river’s water under the 1922 Colorado River Compact.
-
B.
1906 Convention for the Equitable Distribution of the Waters of the Rio Grande
The 1906 Convention for the Equitable Distribution of the Waters of the Rio Grande is a bilateral treaty between the United States and Mexico that allocates the river’s waters for irrigation and establishes rules for their shared management.
-
C.
Upper Colorado River Basin Compact
The Upper Colorado River Basin Compact is a 1948 interstate agreement among the upper basin U.S. states that allocates and governs their shares of Colorado River water under the broader Colorado River Compact framework.
-
D.
Missouri River Basin Compact
The Missouri River Basin Compact is an interstate agreement that allocates and manages the use of water resources among the U.S. states within the Missouri River Basin.
-
E.
Colorado River Compact
The Colorado River Compact is a 1922 interstate agreement that allocates the river’s water among the seven U.S. basin states, forming the legal foundation for managing the Colorado River in the American West.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: United States may pursue claims to enforce the Rio Grande Compact Triple: [Texas v. New Mexico, holding, United States may pursue claims to enforce the Rio Grande Compact]
Generated description
"United States may pursue claims to enforce the Rio Grande Compact" is a legal holding recognizing the federal government's authority to bring claims ensuring compliance with the interstate water-sharing agreement governing the Rio Grande.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States may pursue claims to enforce the Rio Grande Compact Target entity description: "United States may pursue claims to enforce the Rio Grande Compact" is a legal holding recognizing the federal government's authority to bring claims ensuring compliance with the interstate water-sharing agreement governing the Rio Grande.
-
A.
Upper Basin states of the Colorado River Compact
The Upper Basin states of the Colorado River Compact are the U.S. states in the upper portion of the Colorado River watershed—primarily Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, and New Mexico—that share and manage the river’s water under the 1922 Colorado River Compact.
-
B.
1906 Convention for the Equitable Distribution of the Waters of the Rio Grande
The 1906 Convention for the Equitable Distribution of the Waters of the Rio Grande is a bilateral treaty between the United States and Mexico that allocates the river’s waters for irrigation and establishes rules for their shared management.
-
C.
Upper Colorado River Basin Compact
The Upper Colorado River Basin Compact is a 1948 interstate agreement among the upper basin U.S. states that allocates and governs their shares of Colorado River water under the broader Colorado River Compact framework.
-
D.
Missouri River Basin Compact
The Missouri River Basin Compact is an interstate agreement that allocates and manages the use of water resources among the U.S. states within the Missouri River Basin.
-
E.
Colorado River Compact
The Colorado River Compact is a 1922 interstate agreement that allocates the river’s water among the seven U.S. basin states, forming the legal foundation for managing the Colorado River in the American West.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e523c19881909f9197037200dde6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e65af4520c81909986a47289ba801e |
completed | April 20, 2026, 4:57 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a07fdccdf408190b0d1130b82e9bfb2 |
completed | May 16, 2026, 5:17 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_6a07fea23a988190832115346f8889ca |
completed | May 16, 2026, 5:20 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_6a07ff4a59608190a17f30f60c879efc |
completed | May 16, 2026, 5:23 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:54 p.m.