Triple

T19961425
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Texas v. New Mexico E479822 entity
Predicate alleges P16813 FINISHED
Object New Mexico allowed groundwater pumping that interfered with Rio Grande Compact deliveries
New Mexico allowed groundwater pumping that interfered with Rio Grande Compact deliveries is the central allegation in the interstate water dispute case Texas v. New Mexico over Rio Grande River water allocations.
E1403686 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (4 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: New Mexico allowed groundwater pumping that interfered with Rio Grande Compact deliveries | Statement: [Texas v. New Mexico, alleges, New Mexico allowed groundwater pumping that interfered with Rio Grande Compact deliveries]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: New Mexico allowed groundwater pumping that interfered with Rio Grande Compact deliveries
Context triple: [Texas v. New Mexico, alleges, New Mexico allowed groundwater pumping that interfered with Rio Grande Compact deliveries]
  • A. Upper Basin states of the Colorado River Compact
    The Upper Basin states of the Colorado River Compact are the U.S. states in the upper portion of the Colorado River watershed—primarily Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, and New Mexico—that share and manage the river’s water under the 1922 Colorado River Compact.
  • B. Missouri River Basin Compact
    The Missouri River Basin Compact is an interstate agreement that allocates and manages the use of water resources among the U.S. states within the Missouri River Basin.
  • C. Colorado River Compact
    The Colorado River Compact is a 1922 interstate agreement that allocates the river’s water among the seven U.S. basin states, forming the legal foundation for managing the Colorado River in the American West.
  • D. Upper Colorado River Basin Compact
    The Upper Colorado River Basin Compact is a 1948 interstate agreement among the upper basin U.S. states that allocates and governs their shares of Colorado River water under the broader Colorado River Compact framework.
  • E. New Mexico Scenic and Recreational River (upper reaches)
    New Mexico Scenic and Recreational River (upper reaches) is a protected segment of the Pecos River in New Mexico recognized for its outstanding natural beauty, recreational opportunities, and conservation value.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: New Mexico allowed groundwater pumping that interfered with Rio Grande Compact deliveries
Triple: [Texas v. New Mexico, alleges, New Mexico allowed groundwater pumping that interfered with Rio Grande Compact deliveries]
Generated description
New Mexico allowed groundwater pumping that interfered with Rio Grande Compact deliveries is the central allegation in the interstate water dispute case Texas v. New Mexico over Rio Grande River water allocations.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: New Mexico allowed groundwater pumping that interfered with Rio Grande Compact deliveries
Target entity description: New Mexico allowed groundwater pumping that interfered with Rio Grande Compact deliveries is the central allegation in the interstate water dispute case Texas v. New Mexico over Rio Grande River water allocations.
  • A. Upper Basin states of the Colorado River Compact
    The Upper Basin states of the Colorado River Compact are the U.S. states in the upper portion of the Colorado River watershed—primarily Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, and New Mexico—that share and manage the river’s water under the 1922 Colorado River Compact.
  • B. Missouri River Basin Compact
    The Missouri River Basin Compact is an interstate agreement that allocates and manages the use of water resources among the U.S. states within the Missouri River Basin.
  • C. Colorado River Compact
    The Colorado River Compact is a 1922 interstate agreement that allocates the river’s water among the seven U.S. basin states, forming the legal foundation for managing the Colorado River in the American West.
  • D. Upper Colorado River Basin Compact
    The Upper Colorado River Basin Compact is a 1948 interstate agreement among the upper basin U.S. states that allocates and governs their shares of Colorado River water under the broader Colorado River Compact framework.
  • E. New Mexico Scenic and Recreational River (upper reaches)
    New Mexico Scenic and Recreational River (upper reaches) is a protected segment of the Pecos River in New Mexico recognized for its outstanding natural beauty, recreational opportunities, and conservation value.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e523c19881909f9197037200dde6 completed April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e65af4520c81909986a47289ba801e completed April 20, 2026, 4:57 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a07fdccdf408190b0d1130b82e9bfb2 completed May 16, 2026, 5:17 a.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_6a07fea23a988190832115346f8889ca completed May 16, 2026, 5:20 a.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_6a07ff4a59608190a17f30f60c879efc completed May 16, 2026, 5:23 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:54 p.m.