Triple
T19597991
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Delhi High Court |
E470396
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPowerToPunishFor |
P101197
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Contempt of court |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Contempt of court | Statement: [Delhi High Court, hasPowerToPunishFor, Contempt of court]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPowerToPunishFor Context triple: [Delhi High Court, hasPowerToPunishFor, Contempt of court]
-
A.
authorizesPunishment
chosen
Indicates that one entity grants permission or legal authority for another entity to impose a punishment.
-
B.
hasPunishment
Indicates that an entity is subject to a specified penalty, sanction, or adverse consequence as a result of some action, condition, or rule.
-
C.
exercisedPowerOver
Indicates that one entity exerted control, influence, or authority over another entity.
-
D.
exercisedPowerWith
Indicates that one entity actively used or exerted power in conjunction with another entity, implying a shared or coordinated exercise of authority or influence.
-
E.
hasCriminalJurisdictionOver
Indicates that one authority or legal body holds the power to investigate, prosecute, and adjudicate criminal offenses committed within a specified scope or territory in relation to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e510024481908415c0d616fa6186 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:54 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6407c52c081908704d3a4dd6e853b |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3:04 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e514e166dc8190a0f147e0b4c8bbe7 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:43 p.m.