Triple

T19517975
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Pike County, Alabama E488326 entity
Predicate contains P35 FINISHED
Object Goshen, Alabama E708537 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Goshen, Alabama | Statement: [Pike County, Alabama, contains, Goshen, Alabama]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Goshen, Alabama
Context triple: [Pike County, Alabama, contains, Goshen, Alabama]
  • A. Goshen, Alabama chosen
    Goshen, Alabama is a small rural town located in southeastern Alabama known for its close-knit community and agricultural surroundings.
  • B. Shorterville, Alabama
    Shorterville, Alabama is a small unincorporated community and rural locality in eastern Henry County near the Chattahoochee River.
  • C. Goodsprings, Alabama
    Goodsprings, Alabama is a small unincorporated rural community located in Walker County in the north-central part of the state.
  • D. Gainestown, Alabama
    Gainestown, Alabama is a small unincorporated community and historic river town located in Clarke County in southwestern Alabama.
  • E. Milstead, Alabama
    Milstead, Alabama is a small unincorporated rural community located in Macon County in the east-central part of the state.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8da8bec819081f400199491ccc3 completed April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6359da24c81909a0fd165a0fc0e33 completed April 20, 2026, 2:18 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a074727002c8190aa3783c66242a4e4 completed May 15, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:40 p.m.