Triple

T19305700
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ballard County E482821 entity
Predicate hasBorderWith P224 FINISHED
Object Hickman County E482822 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hickman County | Statement: [Ballard County, hasBorderWith, Hickman County]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hickman County
Context triple: [Ballard County, hasBorderWith, Hickman County]
  • A. Hickman County chosen
    Hickman County is a rural county in far western Kentucky, known for its location along the Mississippi River within the Jackson Purchase region.
  • B. Spink County
    Spink County is a rural county in northeastern South Dakota known for its agricultural economy and small communities, including its county seat, Redfield.
  • C. Burke County
    Burke County is a largely rural county in eastern Georgia known for its agricultural landscape and small towns such as Sardis and Waynesboro.
  • D. Childress County
    Childress County is a rural county in the eastern Texas Panhandle known for its agricultural economy and county seat, the city of Childress.
  • E. Hardeman County
    Hardeman County is a rural county in northern Texas known for its agricultural economy and small-town communities near the Oklahoma border.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8d04d5c8190baa816986f2b1d1e completed April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e604c84fe08190869463bdd0324160 completed April 20, 2026, 10:49 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a071bd4547481909407bab52018a6e3 completed May 15, 2026, 1:12 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:31 p.m.