Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Hugh de Beaumont, 1st Earl of Bedford | Statement: [Henry de Beaumont, 1st Earl of Warwick, sibling, Hugh de Beaumont, 1st Earl of Bedford]

Target entity: Hugh de Beaumont, 1st Earl of Bedford
Context triple: [Henry de Beaumont, 1st Earl of Warwick, sibling, Hugh de Beaumont, 1st Earl of Bedford]

• A. Hugh de Beaumont, 1st Earl of Bedford chosen
  Hugh de Beaumont, 1st Earl of Bedford, was a 12th-century Anglo-Norman nobleman and royal supporter who became the first holder of the earldom of Bedford under King Stephen of England.
• B. William de Bohun, 1st Earl of Northampton
  William de Bohun, 1st Earl of Northampton, was a prominent 14th-century English nobleman and military commander who played a key role in the early stages of the Hundred Years’ War under King Edward III.
• C. George Plantagenet, 1st Duke of Bedford
  George Plantagenet, 1st Duke of Bedford, was a short-lived English royal prince of the House of York, born posthumously to George, Duke of Clarence, and thus a nephew of King Edward IV and cousin to Edward V.
• D. Hugh de Montgomery, 2nd Earl of Shrewsbury
  Hugh de Montgomery, 2nd Earl of Shrewsbury, was an Anglo-Norman nobleman of the late 11th century who inherited extensive lands and titles from his powerful father, Roger de Montgomery, and was notably involved in the Norman expansion into Wales before his death in battle.
• E. Roger de Beaumont, 2nd Earl of Warwick
  Roger de Beaumont, 2nd Earl of Warwick, was a prominent 12th-century Anglo-Norman nobleman and magnate who played a significant role in the politics and governance of medieval England.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.